The two-week trial in New Mexico centered on accusations Facebook deceived users about a data breach.
107 comments
This is an inconvenient reminder for people who want more "regulation" and who believe states with high levels of paper regulation like California really care about protecting consumers.
Years down the line, you'll find that a bunch of the people who worked on these cases have cush jobs working on the other side.
You are focusing on the money, which is not the important part. The important part is that the settlement just settled that one lawsuit. There are many thousands of individual lawsuits over many of the same issues, mostly by local governments (school districts).
Almost all the work the nearly 50 states in the multi-state lawsuit put in to prepare their case, such as depositions, getting expert reports, their successful legal arguments, the testimony from the trial, etc can be used by the plaintiffs in all those other suits.
This basically gives all those plaintiffs a fully loaded giant legal cannon that was custom built using the vast resources of the Attorney General's offices of almost 50 states specifically as an anti-Meta weapon.
> people who want more "regulation"
Same as this:
> who believe states with high levels of paper regulation
I _do_ want real regulations with teeth against shitty companies like Meta. Just because California has done a performative take doesn't make expecting more controls on these scumbags a wrong thing to expect. Bad execution doesn't make the idea wrong, your scare-quotes be damned.
You can reliably tell what the most upvoted comments will be
Does that mean we should always hate on big tech? No. If a platform is getting unfairly targeted, that's nice to know. But you come here to get the general sense of the landscape and the first comment is always slanted in favor of big corporate
It does raise the question of the value of California’s bureaucratic burden.
(Yeah, 'Book. We know email exists. You apparently don't. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4151433)
Uber only exists because it ignored taxi regulations long enough to be too big to kill, right?
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- Hacker News · 11 points · 8 days ago
- Hacker News · 1 points · 4 days ago
- Cambridge Analytica 2.0 – When the AI Assistant Becomes a Intelligence Graphfuturium.ec.europa.euHacker News · 1 points · 5 days ago
- Ars Technica · 0 points · 7 days ago
- Hacker News · 1 points · 7 days ago
- Hacker News · 797 points · 9 days ago