46 comments
Not sure if I should release it, but I'm sure more people are catching onto the power of agentic browsing.
Also it’s great(!) to see that we’re going from “but ethics” to “I got mine, who cares”.
Humans are interesting creatures.
Edit: Please before assuming that I'm assuming things, this is an observation I'm making over time. It's possible that I'm in a bubble, but it's not a sample size of 1 (i.e. The comment I replied only).
It's not that "we" are going from one thing to another. It's that these are two different people, with different ethical boundaries.
Is that necessary? You could start Chromium with an open debug port and use Chrome Devtools Protocol to send commands.
But I'm wondering: at what cost?
(×) and their AI delegates
So of course I clicked yes and it dutifully convinced the site that it was not a bot.
Muse's utility has significantly dropped with the blockages.
To become truly useful again they will need to use residential proxies, but I can't see them use those due to the risks and reputational damage.
One thing with Muse though is that you can scrape Meta's own sites which are currently all going under login walls and restricting discovery/search entirely.
Spamhaus is nearly thirty years old and the notion of electronic distribution of IP and domain "reputation" lists is at least that old.
I'll bet my hat that the Internet "advertising" [0] industry has been calculating and determining the reputation of individual households (if not individual users) for at least a decade.
[0] The scare quotes are because its primary purpose these days is for dragnet private-sector surveillance.
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- The Verge · 0 points · 1 day ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 13 days ago
- Amazon doesn’t trust Meta’s Muse AI agenttheverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 11 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 8 days ago
- Hacker News · 110 points · 7 days ago
- Web Scraping Tips And Tricksgo-colly.orgLobsters · 10 points · almost 9 years ago