Apple's upcoming smart home camera is reportedly taking a very different approach to products from Ring and Google Nest, with the device designed to understand what is happening around the home without recording…
22 comments
How is this getting investor money, and how are consumers seeing this as something worth paying for?
It's just not hard to just flip the light switch when you leave the room, and you don't need an all-seeing eye uploading everything that happens in your house to a massive corporation.
I can't believe this is a feature that gets the hype that it does. It's almost as cliche as the example of making a dinner reservation.
You could not pay me to use such a stupid device. No clue why people invest in or purchase such a product.
But ya, it's not that hard, the only place I've found a motion sensor to be useful was in the garage.
Thanks for letting us know that it's mainly the surveillance device. The advanced one.
Unfortunately apple devices collect EXTREME amounts of telemetry, you are opted-in by default, and much of it is impossible to opt-out of.
"You think your watch records the audio around you? No no no. The audio flows into the Secure Enclave, and flowing is definitely not recording because it’s a different word." (https://leancrew.com/all-this/2026/09/new-apple-watches-have...)
via https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/record
Seems accurate if the audio captured isn't stored in a reproducible fashion.
Of course, Apple still collects more data than it needs to and abuses users in other ways, so I don't really feel bad for them.
that’s really the question to be answered here.
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- The Verge · 0 points · about 3 hours ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 1 day ago
- The smart home graveyard is getting crowdedtheverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 5 days ago
- Hacker News · 1 points · 1 day ago
- Hacker News · 1 points · 2 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 8 days ago