On inheriting my mum's sentences, and watching them read as a machine's

28 points•eustoria•about 14 hours ago•21 comments•

21 comments

dhanushabout 12 hours ago
I was considering adding a permanent disclaimer to every blog post on my site about it not being AI written. Then I relented. Because I don’t have to explain to strangers on the internet that I wrote it myself. I like writing, and even if it is imperfect at times I’m okay with that. But I do catch myself editing my own words multiples times a day. Because I'm less sure if that sentence structure is truly mine or a side effect of me conversing with LLMs so much.

I'm trying to counter this by trying to read more fiction, but for every page that I read, I'm probably reading 50 pages or so of LLM output. So I think this is a battle I'm going to lose out on in the long term. And I can probably only delay the inevitable.

But yeah, I don't like beginning to lose or doubt my own writing voice one bit.

FLeXMurphyabout 12 hours ago
There are two main subjects covered in this and it makes no sense. The first 3/4s deal with the reshaping of language, then the last 1/4 go to talk about Tailwind's layoffs, due to search engines/LLMs upfront providing answers. I don't see the point of the article because it never concludes the two subjects in unity.

The whole dashes debacle never made any sense, because many people are aware if you press and hold the hyphen "button" on your mobile touchscreen, it presents you options with different lengths you can choose from. That it was ever used as a signifier of LLM-written text meant that it can only show a false positive. For the last 20 or so years, a lot of web designers and content creators were "trained" on Elements of Style and other "best practices" cookbooks. People knew when to use what type of dash through these sources, as it gave a bit more of an elegant look to the presentation.

john_strinlaiabout 12 hours ago
>then the last 1/4 go to talk about Tailwind's layoffs

how are you measuring length?

because tailwind is not mentioned until the very last paragraph, 1900 words into a 2000 word article. and it is talked about for 3 whole sentences.

FLeXMurphyabout 11 hours ago
The article repeats and belabors over the first point, so I just quantize it. Simple as.
MitPittabout 13 hours ago
> I take out em dashes and replace them with commas or full stops

Yeah that's your problem. I like my em dashes. You don't need to be ashamed of your style just because it got mainstream. Doesn't matter whether it's AI or a fashion fad. It's like liking a music band before it gets popular on tiktok.

happytoexplainabout 12 hours ago
I agree it's a shame, but your comparison is confusing. Not wanting your writing to be mistaken for AI is not the same emotion as not wanting your writing to be interpreted as having "mainstream" or "fad" elements. They're completely different motivations.
MitPittabout 12 hours ago
It's the same emotion as if you're enjoying ska music subculture, but can't dress in its style of clothes, because people will think you're a skinhead.

You'll be judged for riding in your old Tesla car, because people may think you're a fan of modern Elon.

It may sound like a stretch, but I feel it's virtually the same thing — style.

gdulliabout 12 hours ago
If someone thinks my taste in music is lame because I like Dave Matthews Band, I'll wear that. But if someone thinks I don't care enough about the quality of my output to produce it myself, that's a more real and tangible hit to my reputation.
mcphageabout 8 hours ago
> You don't need to be ashamed of your style just because it got mainstream

It's not about shame, it's about your work being dismissed because it's an indicator that you didn't put any effort into it.

Although by the end, the article veers somewhat, and reads more like "I put a lot of effort into my writing, and just because I use AI also doesn't mean that I want to be lumped in with the people churning out AI slop". Which, okay, but that's not quite as noble a position as they seemed to start off with.

fwlrabout 12 hours ago
I used to joke about a hypothetical programmer with so much mechanical empathy that he would oppose fuzzers because a program would find it very uncomfortable to be fuzz-tested.

It now occurs to me, non-humorously, that’s what this person and many others are going through with AI: it’s a multi-year fuzz test of their sense of self, their methods for ideation and expression, and their ethical principles on attribution and intellectual property.

Read the full thread on Hacker News →

Related stories