Stephen Wolfram chimes in about the future of pure math and AI based on his unique perspective of language creator and scientific researcher.
1 comment
alok-g2 days ago
Useful mathematics need not mean understandable by humans. Why cannot AI, in the future, also figure what mathematics is useful. Whatever role we see for humans in mathematics, could possibly be picked up (and done better) by AI (in the future). Choosing proofs, strategies, abstractions, figuring utility, intuitiveness, all are in principle a search problem, including meta-search where needed.
I wonder if the advantage AI has is simply that it has absorbed vastly more collective mathematical experience and can therefore provide better search heuristics than a human.
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- The Verge · 0 points · 3 days ago
- Can you forget how you feel about Meta?theverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 9 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 5 days ago
- Can John Ternus find Apple’s next big thing?theverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 10 days ago
- Hacker News · 73 points · 9 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 12 days ago