The shutdown of June Oven is another reminder that the cloud was never ours to keep.

54 points•CrypticShift•3 days ago•69 comments•

69 comments

cadamsdotcom2 days ago
My house has smart light switches. They use ancient technologies of injection molding and metal wires. Their firmware has not needed an update and I haven't had to reboot them; they also recover instantly from power failures. I haven't measure their boot time but it's impressive. Probably 1/50 seconds is my guess, based on the AC switching frequency. Their data collection is primitive, and the retention is only a few hundred nanoseconds. They're quite good about not selling data about when I'm home to insurance companies or advertisers. And they use ancient principles of physics to destroy data securely. Their registration and account creation process didn't store my home address in some vendor's questionably secured database, so it can't be sold when these vendors fold in 5-10 years. It doesn't stop working while I'm traveling and never leaves my family without working lights, in fact I've yet to get one tech support call for light switches.

Home Assistant won't read the state of them so they're lacking in integration, but the plus was that caused me to not set up Home Assistant. Not making a fragile computer a single point of failure and not tying my whole house to one shared-fate system with all the failure modes of a small scale full stack SaaS gave me a couple more nines of reliability.

One downside is the commute to the wall if you want to use them. Commuting to a light switch is actually good though, I'm pleased to report it's a nice stroll. It takes around the same time it takes to unlock my phone and discover my phone can't switch on the lights in my house. It goes past a window so it has views.

When I read some vendors' stuff was gonna stop working I went home and turned off and on all my light switches to simulate a reboot in solidarity for those whose hobby is to make their home less usable. Hopefully you folks are able to spend a few hundred bucks more to refresh your stuff for this decade. If you need me, I'll be over at the wall panel.

happymellon2 days ago
> Home Assistant won't read the state of them so they're lacking in integration, but the plus was that caused me to not set up Home Assistant. Not making a fragile computer a single point of failure and not tying my whole house to one shared-fate system with all the failure modes of a small scale full stack SaaS gave me a couple more nines of reliability.

My light switches integrate with Home Assistant, but I can just press the button or turn the knob to dim. Home Assistant Zigbee is there as a bonus, not the sole way of doing things and certainly not a single point of failure.

Oxodao2 days ago
> Not making a fragile computer a single point of failure

You can set it up in a way that it does work without it but can be enhanced with it. Some zigbee switch work like that (Like the Aqara one).

Also, Home Assistant is the most rock-solid piece of software I ran in a long time, it just never breaks for me

antiquark2 days ago
Not to mention the sheer reliability (uptime) of the LCPT (legacy copper plastic technology) switches. We're talking like 99.999% uptime here.
seemaze2 days ago
Isn't downtime the whole point of having a switch though?
joshstrange2 days ago
You can get that exact same experience with Zigbee/z-wave smart switches. I have 74 of them in my house (replaced them all when I moved in) and haven’t had to think about them past that. They work by flipping the switch, they work by voice (Alexa), and via HA and anything that can talk to HA.

If HA goes down I can just walk over and use the switch. A downgrade over yelling into the air for sure but my downgrade is your daily experience.

If someone comes over that doesn’t know how or doesn’t want to use the smart speakers, they can just walk over and flip a switch.

After moving HA off a Pi I found it to be rock solid and I don’t think about it at all unless I want to make or tweak some automation or I get a new device. Adding Claude into the mix for creating/modifying automations is awesome.

dreamcompiler2 days ago
Dumb devices work as expected for at least 20 years and then you replace them.

Smart devices work as expected for a year, fail in new and exciting ways, and then you replace them with dumb devices.

The light switches in my grandparents' house are two years short of being a hundred years old. I'm fairly confident they'll still be there after I'm gone.

There's also a pelton-wheel turbine generator in the basement from before there was mains electricity which most likely would still work with a bit of a cleanup and oil.

There's not a single "smart" anything in the whole house. Things just work.

pkthunder3 days ago
I was (naively, looking back) pretty bullish on smart home devices. Automating schedules, presence detection, etc. Every time I looked to invest more into it, the marketplace felt like a minefield of e(ventual)-waste and headache.

I still struggle with it. It feels like a missed opportunity these days, but I just don’t trust companies to treat me or my devices with respect. I’ve ultimately boomeranged back to “no (cloud) smart devices.”

cassianoleal3 days ago
Yep I have 4 different presence detectors. A few units of each. None of them work in a way that satisfies my requirements.

Smart light bulbs are another minefield of low-CRI, bad connectivity, worse firmwares, nerfed local featureset, etc.

poisonborz2 days ago
> Smart light bulbs are another minefield

Just buy Hue, problem solved - although for best results it needs custom setup which is a higher initial time investment, buth then it's set and forget.

24t2 days ago
>None of them work in a way that satisfies my requirements

care to expand on which areas the units are lacking in? I've thought about getting presence sensors recently

ToucanLoucan2 days ago
I still have a lot of the same stuff I bought, which falls into two main categories:

* Hue bulbs, which get active updates and are still maintained by Philips, and honestly are pretty good, if insanely overpriced, especially the HomeKit bridge

* "iHome" smart outlets which I belieeeeeeeve were once upon a time made by Belkin? They've ended support but the outlets themselves are very reliable, and pairable/managable entirely within the Home app so I barely noticed when they were discontinued. Picked up a 4-pack of them on fleabay recently for $20 and they work great still.

Mind you I'm not saying I'm great at this, if anything I'm lucky in that I really haven't had any smart home tech go poorly for me, apart from some other outlets that were some no-name brand. They're still kicking around my house but they need power cycles far more often than the iHome ones.

kombookcha2 days ago
I would be interested in Hue, except Philips sold me an earlier iteration of a smart lamp which I loved for its ability to gently wake me up in the morning by slowly turning up the light. I love waking up without a loud alarm clock. In fact, I loved that so much I invested in a smart home hub to get Hue bulbs, and then Philips promptly bricked my original lamp. Unless I eventually bought a fancier home hub, which could grandfather it in!

No matter the convenience of a given smarthome feature, it will have to overcome the hurdle of all the time and money I invest in setting it up being liable to get vaporized at the click of a button from the supplier. Ultra frustrating experience, but one that instantly cured me of any romantic notions about the futuristic smart home.

ghaff2 days ago
When I had to get a lot of work done on my house after a kitchen fire (appliance but not a smart one), I told pretty much everyone involved "nothing smart." (OK, the new dryer has a moisture sensor but that's it. Didn't have much that was smart anyway aside from a couple of Alexas that I use rarely.

I think there was also a novelty around a lot of smart devices that just didn't translate to much real world benefit. And in my case here, there was also the matter of having more pressing issues than fussing with smart lights and the like--like rewiring a substantial portion of the house when various walls were open..

tencentshill2 days ago
Homekit certification is the closest you can get. Devices are required to function offline on LAN through an Apple home hub. Apple has a much better track record supporting things than any of these random vendors. And it can be entirely replaced by Home Assistant anyways.
kashunstva2 days ago
I simply won’t install anything that doesn’t support a local API. Happy to pay for the hardware; but if your plan is to monetize it via cloud services somehow, or just assume planned obsolescence, I’m not your customer.
Oxodao2 days ago
Even with local API I'm quite a bit hesitant, I'd rather not use anything that does not let me install an opensource firmware (e.g. wled for RGBCCT led strip controller).

I haven't made a vlan yet for IoT stuff because my ISP's router do not let me, I can't wait to have my own openwrt / opnsense router and put the ISP in bridge mode.

tzs2 days ago
I've seen people suggest that instead of bridge mode go ahead and leave the ISP router in router mode, with wifi turned off, with your own router as the only device connected. Give your router a static IP on the ISP router's LAN and set it up on the ISP router as the DMZ.

That advantage of this is that some ISPs will try to blame your router (and your modem if you are using your own modem) for any problem you call in about no matter how obviously it is a problem on their end or with their equipment. This way it is not obvious to the tier 1 tech support people that you are using a different router.

I suppose if you want to be really thorough leave the wifi on, either with whatever the default network names the ISP router starts with or with names that don't match the ones you really use which are on your router.

amelius2 days ago
This is why I don't buy Apple products. You can't realistically use them after breaking all ties with the vendor.
toss12 days ago
Exactly!

If your device requires, in any way, an internet or cloud connection, even just for setup, it doesn't exist for me. If you have some FULLY OPTIONAL services I might like as a SAAS free or subscription option, ok; but the device MUST 100% work without ever knowing your cloud exists. It must also be designed to fail-safe and have manual fall-back operability (e.g., when the power goes out, I can still manually switch its state to OFF).

I recall an article or comment on HN talking about the advantages of a "MidWit Home", devices that weren't really smart, and just had remote control. I've got a bit of that with some remote switches to use around the house with enough range we can turn on from the car when arriving home. Also timers. Seems like a good way to go.

emursebrian2 days ago
I want appliances that are reliable and last a lifetime, I don't care about smart features. I bought a basic washing machine back in 2005. Roper brand, which is Whirlpool's value-priced line. The cycles are programmed purely mechanically using a cam timer.

Since I've owned it, all I've had to do is replace the clutch which was like a $25 part at the time. Doing it yourself (or having a repair technician take care of it), is easier and more cost-effective than hauling it out and buying a new one.

Cloud enabled features on home appliances had extra complexity and the chance your device will be bricked when the manufacturer decides to discontinue their cloud services.

FinnLobsien2 days ago
Imo, the problem with most smart kitchen devices has always been that the added benefit was never big enough to warrant the steep prices.

The June oven had computer vision to detect the food and probes to test for internal temperature and could tell the user when their food was ready.

Maybe nice for a restaurant juggling dozens of dishes in ovens, but at home, I don't need this at all because I can tell when the cheese on top is caramelized.

At $600-1500, that's a high premium for a countertop oven.

torginus2 days ago
> Maybe nice for a restaurant juggling dozens of dishes in ovens

Question is - are these things good enough that restaurants actually use them? I would be surprised if they were.

jerf2 days ago
The math I have always done is, "If I removed 100% of my issues with controlling my home appliances and I was absolutely sure it would only ever cost me, let's say, $1000, and it was never going to need maintenance and would never fail, how interested would I be?"

And the answer still keeps coming back, "not very". Not zero. But the problem is that there isn't a lot of value there to capture, so I'm not willing to pay all that much, especially when you consider the full cost-of-ownership of failure modes that they create. The daily annoyance of "flipping some light switches" just isn't that great.

That this industry keeps getting run by MBAs who keep calculating

    1. Hey we can lock them in with these centralized services.
    2. (A couple of years later) Hey we can make more money if we 
       shut down our old centralized services.
on time frames shorter than the expected replacement of the things being controlled by those services doesn't help.

At least my smart phone, as much as we may all like to complain, brings a lot of value to me that can be leveraged for that sweet, sweet MBA-approved lockin. The smart home proposition never had anywhere near as much to leverage. And the smart phone world still is full of MBAs delusional enough to think that "storing the user's heartbeat information in the cloud" is somehow enough leverage to be worth a $9.95/month subscription to me.

Read the full thread on Hacker News →

Related stories