Yes, Opus 5.5 and Astra-6 are big improvements over Opus 5 and Sol-5.6. I'm at a point where I can automate much of my workflow, even for complicated tasks, which I could never do before.

Also the new Xiaomi model, Mimo v2.6, is outstanding as a light and cheap model. For coding, the new meta is using Astra-6-Max for orchestration and architecture, and Mimo for grunt work.

i dont see any massive changes between opus 5 and opus 5.5 i think it burns more tokens then opus 5

Yep, I'm personally finding Opus 5.5 to be the first real leap I've felt since Opus 4.5. The time-to-first-token seems dramatically better in Claude Code compared to Fable 5.1/Opus 5 as well, which really helps both interactivity and also overall time-to-completion.

It also burns Claude subscription quota much more slowly than Fable, which is nice.

Anthropic's naming convention seems to follow an S-curve. So Opus 5 is actually a little worse than 4.7, but by the time it hits 5.5, it's at the steep part of the new S-curve.

Similar with Claude 4 being worse than 3.7, but peaking at 4.5. At 4.6 they started to hit the restrictions and 4.7 seemed to patch what they made worse.

I’m also finding Opus 5.5 to be a significant advance. In the past few days, I’ve given it several complex tasks related to two long-term dictionary-building projects [1, 2], and it handled them impressively—similar to Fable but with much lower token consumption. It also communicates better than Opus 5.1; I don’t think I’ve seen any obvious Claudisms yet.

[1] https://www.tkgje.jp/

[2] https://tkgally.github.io/eex-dict/index.html