For years developers of one component of GNOME argued that my fix for a regression they introduced in 2019 was not valid. Only to implement pretty much the same fix years later.
14 comments
I just went to check again, and yes, even in 2026, GNOME devs are angry that you use a trackpad and not the specific mouse that the devs use.
Gnome’s own research said the average person uses something like 5-8 apps IIRC. I don’t need some convoluted workspace system for something I can fit on a dock that spans 1/3 of the screen.
If the vertical space is so valuable, maybe they should stop supporting 1920x1080 as a resolution since 1920x1200 is better. Lol.
In any case, I think the author is misguided, spending valuable energy in a futile endeavour.
Just use a patched version with your own fix. A lot of package managers make this trivial.
When I send code upstream, I don't care about it at all. If they ignore me, it doesn't affect me because I am already running my own version.
Nowadays, this is even easier because you can use llms to handle the possible merge conflicts during updates.
I made it very clear the point wasn't about me, or my patch, it's about *their practices*.
I have nothing else to add, it's self explanatory.
> Let’s make one thing clear: even if Satan was the one providing a patch, if the patch is valid and fixes a real issue, you apply the patch, period. Why? Because that’s what is best for the users.
Amen
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- If we fix the phone, we fix societyelysian.pressHacker News · 1 points · 7 days ago
- Hacker News · 3 points · about 15 hours ago
- DEV Community · 28 points · 8 days ago
- Show HN: A poetry site for developers – solve a code puzzle to postdeveloperpoetry.comHacker News · 1 points · 11 days ago
- DEV Community · 11 points · 8 days ago
- Hacker News · 6 points · 11 days ago