For years developers of one component of GNOME argued that my fix for a regression they introduced in 2019 was not valid. Only to implement pretty much the same fix years later.

39 points•Muhammad523•5 days ago•14 comments•

14 comments

richfree5 days ago
I never used GNOME the moment that I learned it didn't have scroll sensitivity in the settings as a DELIBERATE decision. That was in 2018.

I just went to check again, and yes, even in 2026, GNOME devs are angry that you use a trackpad and not the specific mouse that the devs use.

donmcronald5 days ago
Yeah. A lot of Gnome feels like an edgy teenager going against the grain just to be different. No dock. No window controls. No system tray.

Gnome’s own research said the average person uses something like 5-8 apps IIRC. I don’t need some convoluted workspace system for something I can fit on a dock that spans 1/3 of the screen.

If the vertical space is so valuable, maybe they should stop supporting 1920x1080 as a resolution since 1920x1200 is better. Lol.

lp925 days ago
And people wonder why Microsoft still dominates the desktop space despite how terrible Win 11 is.
kentrado5 days ago
I thought this was going to be about gnome's controversial design decisions.

In any case, I think the author is misguided, spending valuable energy in a futile endeavour.

Just use a patched version with your own fix. A lot of package managers make this trivial.

When I send code upstream, I don't care about it at all. If they ignore me, it doesn't affect me because I am already running my own version.

Nowadays, this is even easier because you can use llms to handle the possible merge conflicts during updates.

felipec5 days ago
1. What makes you think I didn't use a patched version? 2. I said I'm using kitty now, I don't care what they do.

I made it very clear the point wasn't about me, or my patch, it's about *their practices*.

rustcleaner5 days ago
GNOME was dead with GNOME 3.

I have nothing else to add, it's self explanatory.

dmitrygr5 days ago
> Because this isn’t my first rodeo, I can already foresee the criticism of this article: people are going to focus on my persona and my tone, not on what matters: GNOME‘s shitty practices.

> Let’s make one thing clear: even if Satan was the one providing a patch, if the patch is valid and fixes a real issue, you apply the patch, period. Why? Because that’s what is best for the users.

Amen

rurban5 days ago
Same as perl5 maintainance. When incompetence meets arrogance, it's game over.

Read the full thread on Hacker News →

Related stories