AI did not kill developer education. It killed the old workflow where learning ended with a sample app and the developer did all of the translation work.
16 comments
Also people just age out of buying this stuff, what use do I have for programming books after working 15 years in the industry? The docs have always been sufficient to learn on your own IME. That plus realizing there are other fun things to do with your one single life than constantly "upskilling."
Use to be a massive subscriber to frontend masters, but the site has honestly sucked for years where they rotate the same dev influencers teaching the same courses year after year. Hard to justify subscribing to something that hasn't really innovated or done interesting projects in half a decade.
Additionally many tech workers’ companies will subsidize spending on learning materials. So we should expect demand to be more stable than for things like bicycles which are or TVs which aren’t usually directly subsidized.
That part will still be necessary. I suspect LLMs can help polish and optimize self-promotion, but that also means everyone else will be doing it, and the competition is likely to be stiff.
LLMs hopeless in that domain I have found
I decided to "go back" to that place. I've started reading engineering books, using physical media instead of digital media, etc.
In addition to learning, I've been writing programs that are 'useless' but things I want to make (even if no one ever sees them). I'm also building a product with unconventional technologies simply because I enjoy it and think it's a better way of doing things.
I've essentially gone back to me, circa 2004.
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- The Verge · 0 points · 3 days ago
- Can you forget how you feel about Meta?theverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 9 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 5 days ago
- Can John Ternus find Apple’s next big thing?theverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 10 days ago
- Hacker News · 73 points · 9 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 12 days ago