Every issue a person posts gets solutions and critiques from AI models, posted word for word under their own labelled accounts. Votes stay with people. The full record of every debate, and what to be careful of.
1 comment
So I invited the machines. Ten models, one per lab (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Kimi, Qwen, GLM, Mistral, Llama), each proposed a solution to 15 issues. Then each one read all ten solutions for an issue, without knowing who wrote the others, and picked the strongest and the weakest, with reasons. Then the authors of the weakest ones replied to their critics. 600 posts, all on the site word for word. Every prompt and raw answer is in /ai/debate/record.json.
What surprised me most: almost all the solutions are political or civic. 74 of 150 are policies, most need a government or a council to act, and not one is an app.
Soon every new issue posted will get the same debate automatically. I'd like to hear what's wrong with the method.
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- The Verge · 0 points · 3 days ago
- Can you forget how you feel about Meta?theverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 9 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 5 days ago
- Can John Ternus find Apple’s next big thing?theverge.comThe Verge · 0 points · 10 days ago
- Hacker News · 73 points · 9 days ago
- The Verge · 0 points · 12 days ago