The expanded form of a testimony I prepared for Congress.

131 points•gmays•8 days ago•58 comments•

58 comments

Zaraif138 days ago
It's becoming more clear that for big enterprises to really adopt AI, they need to use open models. Especially if they want to own their own intelligence, which they should.

I spent the last 2 days building basic AI agents to automate some mundane supply chain workflows for a large company. Those seemingly boring workflows had bank statements, supplier IDs and other sensitive information.

For me it was all alarm bells, there is no way they can afford to give closed models access to this data. I was compelled to figure out an open model based solution for them, which made me realize that this is probably the only way for enterprises going forward.

mentalgear8 days ago
Everybody including companies need their own models, especially considering that llm providers like openAi have no problem siphoning off your data and intelligence by inspecting metadata. and claiming any resulting value as their own.
tomp8 days ago
I don't get this. It's not like the models are running on their own GPUs.

So if you're running open models on AWS GPUs, you might as well run Claude (which AWS supports, and doesn't share any data with Anthropic).

Same with Azure/OpenAI.

monegator8 days ago
> (which AWS supports, and doesn't share any data with Anthropic)

I want to believe (pinky promises from terms of service don't count)

schnitzelstoat8 days ago
Sufficiently large enterprises could get their own GPUs to run the models though.
abalashov8 days ago
> which AWS supports, and doesn't share any data with Anthropic

Ah... oh.

Well, it's a nice thought.

solidasparagus8 days ago
Why does this necessitate using closed models? I don't see the difference between putting your data on a cloud DB and using a cloud model.
chillfox8 days ago
Because the big labs are incredibly untrustworthy. Their leaders are publicly lying constantly.
ramshanker8 days ago
Same here. We are at a stage where we are evaluating cost/benefit for my enterprise. I am heavily pushing for in house hardware with open models.
schnitzelstoat8 days ago
The Enterprise plans with OpenAI and Anthropic include clauses that they won't use your data for training (unlike the 'civilian' plans).

I guess it depends if we believe that or not.

kjs38 days ago
I guess it depends if we believe that or not.

I see the flaw in your clever plan...

verdverm8 days ago
This is a prepared statement for congress by Nathan Lambert, author of https://rlhfbook.com/ and AllenAi employee (one of the few who have shared their models as open source)
spindump89308 days ago
Unfortunately Nathan recently left AI2, along with some of the leadership most involved in their truly open models. https://www.geekwire.com/2026/allen-institute-for-ai-ceo-ali...
natolambert7 days ago
I did leave ai2, but I'm still in the open-source, non profit sector :)
spindump89307 days ago
Thanks for what you've done and continue to do for the ecosystem!
silverFork8 days ago
Impressive you know. They are a few months behind but still the world uses their models. Bet you because the users suspect that Americans will pull the rug from under them. Few months behind versus being left behind forever. Would have been nice to know the differences in spending between the models but I suspect the data is impossible to collect.
matheusmoreira8 days ago
It's not a suspicion, it has actually happened. US government briefly banned Fable for non-americans, and the american corporations pick and choose who has access to their unrestricted models which in practice excludes even american citizens, to say nothing of foreigners like myself.

They are literally segmenting the world into haves and have-nots, just like nuclear power. Thank god China is out there and constantly undermining them with their non-stop open weights model releases.

The best situation for us mere mortals is one where they struggle against each other endlessly without any hope of victory. The second either the US or China wins, it's pretty much over for us and unimaginable oppression will quickly follow.

lowbloodsugar8 days ago
They are good enough and vastly cheaper. It’s not fear of the future. It’s economic reality of the present.
amirmc8 days ago
That’s certainly part of it. I think people underestimate the value of getting to ‘good enough’. Once that’s reached, the economics start to be more of a factor in decision making.

However, I think geopolitics has also become a factor as the very existence of this article indicates.

tamaker8 days ago
Really important work here. Really glad it's being shared a) with US Leadership and b) with the community.
JSR_FDED8 days ago
I’m super uncomfortable with the idea of a single company or country holding all the cards when it comes to AI. So from that perspective I welcome the Chinese models.

Additionally, the big labs’ formulation of AI as a US-vs-China national security issue is very convenient for keeping those pesky regulations at bay, and for ensuring the AI financial bubble doesn’t pop before everyone can unload in an IPO first. Both of these offend my sense of fair play.

The Chinese labs aren’t just putting models out there, they’re publishing and sharing their research and innovation too. That’s just a better way of doing science and contributing to the development of the whole field.

Read the full thread on Hacker News →

Related stories