You built something. Maybe you used Cursor, Claude Code, or just had a long conversation with an LLM that ended up generating most of your codebase. Your app works. It solves a problem. You packaged it as a Flatpak…
31 comments
I understand the objections to vibe coding, but for those of us who don’t care how a good tool was built (when it actually is good), this just forces us away from your favorite platform. Like it or not, this is the present and these AI tools are available. People will use them.
That said I think it’s utterly ridiculous that this article was written using AI.
How is using autocomplete "Vibecoding" now? I remember y'all that the "definition" for vibecoding requires the "prompter" to not look at a single line of code
Autocomplete with an LLM, which generates snippets for you is just a lubricated version of "copy and paste back and forth between chat window and code window"
Who is opening up an LLM to run git push?!
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- Hacker News · 1 points · 7 days ago
- Hacker News · 377 points · 16 days ago
- Hacker News · 4 points · 4 days ago
- The lightweight Arch Linux based distro that runs, without root privileges, upon any Linux distrogithub.comLobsters · 12 points · over 4 years ago
- Hacker News · 4 points · 8 days ago
- Show HN: Chow, a FOSS food diarychow.fitHacker News · 1 points · 1 day ago