Are there really such architectural differences between for example sol and astra that makes astra twice more in token price? Or maybe token cost covers training expenses? For me it's hard to believe that astra need…
9 comments
the primary difference you see through those prices is model size
that you don't seem much capability difference is why Big Ai is pushing for regulatory capture, because small models are nearly as good for many tasks at a fraction of the cost, undermining the business model they have used to justify the most expensive infra build out in human history
I am big believer (based on personal experience) that there is a ton of ROI in harness engineering, to go along with the context engineering, invariably intertwined
Read the full thread on Hacker News →
Related stories
- GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol after just 7 days, with near-Astra intelligenceartificialanalysis.aiHacker News · 47 points · about 15 hours ago
- Addendum to GPT-6 Astra System Card: GPT-6.1 Soldeploymentsafety.openai.comHacker News · 3 points · 1 day ago
- Artifical Analysis - GPT-6.1 Sol Replaces 6 Sol After 7 Daysartificialanalysis.aiHacker News · 2 points · 1 day ago
- Hacker News · 2 points · about 8 hours ago
- Better Call Sol or Better yet Claude or Astrathezvi.substack.comHacker News · 2 points · 10 days ago
- Hacker News · 1049 points · 1 day ago