Thanks for checking out, I've added support for manual entry without MCP: https://mysetup.ai/connect

No Codex, Claude, or Pi... now you have peaked my interest with your setup :P

There has to be a much better way to share your setup

From my years of watching people casually `curl randomsite.com/install.sh | bash` you might be a minority there

I recommend using spotify mcp server (if you use spotify), it freed me from the loop of listening to the same stuff again and again :P

I don't use any MCP servers except for Figma!

Serious question, why? Nobody gives a fuck if I'm out of a job, especially OpenAI and Anthropic. They stole the worlds knowledge to put us out of a job and arguably took away what it means to be a human. Why should I contribute anything more to that?

Solving hard problems will be the only thing that separates you from others. Your mindset and tools should be a trade secret at this point.

6 months ago I would have agreed wholeheartedly with you. Lately however I've observed coworkers vibe coding massive band-aids over broader architectural issues in our codebase without any prior context.

They have no understanding of (nor any desire to understand) what they're doing, but they are being given kudos by management for their "initiative" to solve the organization's "big problems." Guess who will be asked to clean up the mess if (when) it blows up.

It's getting cheaper and cheaper to kick the can down the road, and standing in front of that risks making you look like a dinosaur. It's going to be an interesting few years...

I'm also tending towards the generous stance:

1. The value of software is tending towards nil while it's ever easier to tailor bespoke solutions.

That suggests to me that I'm losing less by sharing, and it's probably not even going to be taken wholesale and kept verbatim.

2. The labs have already trained on everything and will keep on doing so.

Therefore continuing to contribute to OSS doesn't just benefit my own future self but the entire ecosystem.

(Yes, I need to get over how it appears a select few are making off with the lion's share but that only differs in degree in comparison to the past)

At least now the cards are being shuffled elsewhere...

completely agree. Same 20 years in the industry

I've landed here as well, but by force. I've actually tried to share some of the productivity and workflow tools I've built with AI that help automate portions of my work, specifically on target firmware debugging, and everyone at work just...ignored it. Didnt care. Of the small number of people who even stopped to look, a few of them were actively negative. Maybe I didnt sell it hard enough, but my job isnt to sell productivity tools internally (or even make them, i did it for myself). So, I'll keep making myself more productive and build tools for myself. And everyone else will just have to figure out their own path. I tried to help, but oh well.

I can appreciate why you'd come to this conclusion, but may I offer one idea that I think you've potentially overlooked?

Unless you are a solo founder running your own company by yourself (in which case ignore the rest of this comment!), then your fundamental job security is likely to be predicated on the survival of your company as well as the survival of your own individual job itself.

From the company-survival POV, all companies are engaged in competition (unless they have a total monopoly).

Therefore I ask you to consider the competitive scenario, of whether a competitor to your company who adopts a more collaborative culture, might be more likely to outcompete your company (assuming everyone you work with in your own company adopts a similarly "dick"-ish stance, to use your own words), and therefore you lose your job due to being out-competed, rather than due to internal politics or due to a failure to guard your personal expertise?

Maybe you say -- I don't care if my company is out-competed, I'll just get another job. Ok fair enough, but might it not be possible that, in a future job interview, they may ask you for examples of collaboration? And if you commit to a monk-like devotion to solitude and privacy, then maybe you are undercutting your own future hireability?

There are no free lunches [1]. By optimizing for one thing (what you view as protecting yourself), you might be sabotaging another dimension (your company's overall competitiveness, or your future hireability).

Anyway, nobody knows shit about shit. I certainly don't pretend to be an authority, but I would caution you to avoid coming to a hasty conclusion, especially since it seems emotions are involved and possibly clouding your judgement. You may also consider whether this decision to protect yourself in this way, is in itself a premature (micro?) optimization of a sort, and if whether you might be failing to optimize on a more macro level.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_such_thing_as_a_free_lunch

  People might think I'm a dick, I don't care, my tools, my knowledge, my job security.

If you're feeling ponderous, I'd ask you to consider the outlandish hypothetical that this doesn't win you meaningful[1] job security, and you end up in the same bucket o' crabs as the rest of us. Would you regret your current actions?

[1]: anywhere from the fathomable "my harness didn't come up in my layoff email nor in any of my failed interviews following that" to the realistic "the entire concept of employment shifted under our feet so quickly and so profoundly that a dash of solidarity & luck outweighed even the shrewdest preparations".