serious
15 stories and discussions about serious, aggregated from every source we track.
Every “AI” tool is missing critical features that you would need if you wanted to do real work with them. What would those look like, if they existed?
Every “AI” tool is missing critical features that you would need if you wanted to do real work with them. What would those look like, if they existed?
A simple ClickFix attack is only one way to completely hijack the new agent.
Introducing acropalypse: a serious privacy vulnerability in the Google Pixel's inbuilt screenshot editing tool, Markup, enabling partial recovery of the original, unedited image data of a cropped and/or redacted…
Hi Guys!!! As you know I wasn't good for well, a week and Now..... Let's Dive In!!! I never...
A while ago when I was running my Talos II in hashed page table (HPT) mode for KVM-PR purposes , I started noticing some weird kernel behavi...
A simple ClickFix attack is only one way to completely hijack the new agent.
Known issues in ChatGPT Work and Codex after OpenAI DevDay 2026, with sources. Corrections welcome via issues. - Boilerplate4u/openai-devday-2026-review
I think we are going to lose the ability to use certain orbits."
The 2013 sci-fi blockbuster film Gravity , starring Sandra Bullock and George Clooney, popularized the notion of the Kessler syndrome. In the movie, Russia shoots down a defunct satellite and creates a cloud of debris, leading to serious tension in orbit. The movie is fantastic, a true thriller, and while some liberties were taken with the depiction of outer space, the basic premise of a cascading series of collisions rendering orbits too cluttered with debris to be usable is valid. The idea was first proposed by NASA scientists Donald Kessler and Burton Cour-Palais nearly half a century ago. Still, the movie was science fiction, right? Read full article Comments
Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has gone to great lengths to hype the security of its new AI assistant Muse, claiming it is “built from the ground up for privacy and security.” A zero-day vulnerability that gives locally run apps and terminal commands complete control of the agent raises serious doubts. Further raising questions, Amazon on Sunday began blocking Muse from its site. Meta introduced Muse a few weeks ago. The assistant “books appointments, fills out forms and handles customer service,” “proactively takes tasks off your plate,” and can “make purchases, generate images, create documents, and connect with your favorite apps and services.” The macOS app (curiously, there’s no Windows version) also works with a user’s WhatsApp, email, calendar, and social media accounts. When a task requires a tool that doesn’t exist, Muse creates one on the fly. Meta doth hype Muse security too much Of course, for Muse to do any of these things, users must first give it access to their accounts. This includes authenticating the assistant to each service and, because the app runs on macOS, giving it permissions to a broad range of operating system-restricted device resources like writing files to disk, accessing the mic and camera, and monitoring location and calendars. Apple has spent years developing these defenses to prevent installed apps or commands entered into the terminal from accessing these resources, clearly because the company considers them a security threat. Muse completely undoes these default measures. Read full article Comments