effort
22 stories and discussions about effort, aggregated from every source we track.
<p>As you may know, there is an effort called <a href="https://www.kiwix.org/" rel="ugc">https://www.kiwix.org/</a> that aims to make available Internet resources offline. It is mainly used to distribute static HTML dumps of Wikipedia, but other websites are supported like the StackExchange network.</p> <p>To be part of kiwix, the source must be Creative Commons or something open enough to allow re-use.</p> <p>So what is the license of lobste.rs?</p>
Analysis of Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first…
Per-step reasoning effort for Claude Code, chosen by Jev, without breaking the prompt cache. Unofficial. - ifoster01/jev-effort
A week in Beijing and Shanghai with the people building AI in China
What effort really is and when to use which level in Claude Code, from my own tests of three builds and a deep dive into Terminal-Bench 3.0 on Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1.
A working playbook: effort by task, model routing, agentic runs, and vibe coding without the surprise bill.
Let Jev steer Claude Code: the right reasoning effort, subagent model and skill for every prompt. A Claude Code plugin powered by TypeSafe's Jev (OpenRouter / TypeSafe). - Akramovic1/jev-pilot
In the Stage 2 report we shipped 20 feature tickets on Fizzy and promised to explore benchmarking the agents all on max-effort. Now we have run it: every model on the board, same tickets, reasoning turned all the way…
Picks the reasoning effort for each turn of Claude Code with a System One classifier - totally-tim/effort-router
If someone responds to your questions with explicit AI responses, there could be a reason
Analysis of Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) and comparison to other AI models across key metrics including quality, price, performance (tokens per second & time to first…
Second brains and productivity tools are just high-effort procrastination. Get off your arse and actually do the work.
Last year, the Trump administration did what it could to shut down work on the next US National Climate Assessment, eliminating funding for the US Global Change Research Program and booting hundreds of contributing authors. The administration even took past reports offline, forcing others to host copies so the information would still be accessible. And this all comes despite the fact that these reports are legally required. Later in the year, the American Geophysical Union and American Meteorological Society announced an effort to give researchers a central place to compile the kind of work that would have fed the next US report, as well as potential regional and local reports. This “ US Climate Collection ” works differently from the US Global Change Research Program or the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Rather than facilitating the writing of a giant, coordinated report, the groups are inviting teams of researchers to publish peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals, which will then be added to a centralized resource for future report-writers. The first paper has now been added to that collection. It’s the work of 149 authors (many of whom had been working on the US report), and it is actually being published in two journals—one operated by the American Geophysical Union and one by the American Meteorological Society. That’s because this paper is intended to provide a roadmap to prioritize future contributions. Read full article Comments